Wow, you have achieved something great together! Once your tangible education for climate output passes the following co-validation requirements, it becomes part of the knowledge library. Let’s test together!
What will be evaluated?
Well-defined structural elements
-
Accessible abstract – max 250 words + 5 keywords
-
includes learning outcomes/ action goals
-
lists target audiences
-
mentions content language
-
includes correct references
-
data/ information/ process is replicable/ reproducible*
-
provides all necessary material in one
-
respects Creative Commons:
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Well-shaped process elements
-
How easy, well and flexible to teach, apply, adapt, use in different contexts and take action on is the outcome?
-
How much interactivity and participatory elements does it foresee? Are they well described?
-
How well is the story about the education for sustainability action told to motivate content usage?
This will be compiled into and overall recommendation
| strong | very well justified | actionable without reservation |
| reliable | generally justified | actionable with limitations |
| potentially informative | not strongly justified, but may yield insights | not actionable, unless the weaknesses are clearly understood and there is way to further support/ improve it |
| not informative | not substantially justified | not actionable |
| misleading | not at all justified | misguiding |
How will it be evaluated?
-
In the framework of an extended peer community, Education for Climate peer reviewers act as either subject, practice, or experience matter experts to ensure the quality of participatory challenge outcomes. about
-
The pool of reviewers is to be consulted by the challenge facilitators when being at the stage of co-validating the participatory challenge outcome to select and reach out to potential co-validators fitting the participatory challenge scope from various perspectives.
-
The Education for Climate Secretariat will
co-confirm that these choices are neutral – i.e. no reviewers from within the participatory challenge – and apt
support potential additional reviewers (like an aspired call for scientists)
coordinate an agreeable review deadline with all involved
-
It is an open review: reviews will be directly posted in the participatory challenge by assigned reviewers under ‘co-validation review’ topic
-
The Education for Climate Secretariate will collate and review these co-validations and will confirm in the challenge group if the content moves to the knowledge library.
-
As challenge facilitator make sure to celebrate your challenge group effort:
update everybody
meet to see if there is hunger for more action